CODE 23ScienceETHICS & POLICYMedicalMy ArchiveScienceETHICS & POLICYMedicalMy Archive
 
GO
Ethics & Policy News Ethics & Policy Poll
Gene Therapy
Engineering
Genetic Testing
Privacy
Discrimination
Patenting
Counseling
Law & Policy
Cloning
Eugenics
 






 
Artists join the genetic revolution in New York exhibit
Researchers build DNA motor that may lead to faster computer chips
97% of our DNA is "junk" which does not appear to serve any function.
  yes  
  no
submit
 
Related
 
 

 

In 1976 surgeons removed cancerous spleen cells from a leukemia patient, John Moore of California (USA), and later developed a cell line (designated "Mo") from the cell sample. In 1979, Moore's doctors applied for a patent on the Mo cell line, which was found to produce high levels of useful (and profitable) proteins. (The patent was granted in 1984.) In 1984, John Moore filed a lawsuit claiming that his blood cells were misappropriated, and that he was entitled to share in the profits derived from commercial uses of these cells.
Save To my Archive

The potential value of the pharmaceuticals derived from the Mo cell line could reach several billion dollars–but the California Supreme Court ruled in 1990 that John Moore has rights to none of it. A clear victory for the biotechnology industry, the court ruled that although John Moore had the right to sue his doctors for failing to inform him of the potential commercial value of his cell line, he did not have rights of ownership over his cells after they had been removed from his body.
Save To my Archive

Leslie Gornstein

 
Science
Medical